Search Results for "review dismissed"

5456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Railway Land Demolition — No Encroachment Rights on Railway Land. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right to occupy railway land, and the demolition was lawful under the Railways Act, 1989.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of their structures on land claimed to b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Returning Plaint Without Reasons in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance. District Court's Order Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Non-Compliance with Commercial Court Act.

The appellant, Shreem Electric Limited, filed a Commercial Suit No. 4 of 2017 before the District Court, Kolhapur, seeking specific performance of pur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal in Classification Dispute. Tribunal's finding that catalyst is distinct from consumable upheld; extended limitation period not applicable without willful mis-declaration.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against Reliance Industries Limited. The dispute centered on the classification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Review Petition to Correct Clerical Error in Writ Order Regarding Gifted Land. Court Held That Review Is Maintainable for Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a review petition filed by J.H.Najumudeen, the petitioner, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Petition Challenging Appointment of Additional Judge as Abuse of Process. Petition filed by an advocate questioning appointment of Respondent No.7 as additional judge of Bombay High Court held to be trumpery and frivolous.

The petitioner, an advocate practicing in the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointment of R...