Madras High Court Allows Review Petition to Correct Clerical Error in Writ Order Regarding Gifted Land. Court Held That Review Is Maintainable for Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a review petition filed by J.H.Najumudeen, the petitioner, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the Madras High Court in WP.No.4455 of 2024. The error pertained to the omission of the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' in paragraph 4 of the order. The petitioner argued that this omission was a clerical mistake that needed rectification to reflect the court's true intention. The respondents included R.Mohan, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Greater Chennai Corporation, and others. The court, comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice C. Kumarappan, considered the submissions. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. P.L. Narayanan, contended that the error was apparent on the face of the record and that review was maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The respondents did not oppose the correction. The court allowed the review petition, holding that the error was indeed clerical and that the phrase should be inserted to give effect to the original order. The court directed that the order be corrected accordingly. The judgment was delivered on 24-02-2026.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review - Clerical Error - Correction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought review of a writ order to correct a clerical error by inserting the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' - The court allowed the review, holding that the error was apparent on the face of the record and that review is maintainable for correcting such mistakes to give effect to the original intention (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the review petition is maintainable for correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024 by inserting the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation'.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The review petition is allowed. The clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024 is corrected by inserting the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' in paragraph 4.

Law Points

  • Review jurisdiction
  • Clerical error correction
  • Article 226
  • Writ petition
  • Gifted land
  • Alienation restriction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 45

REV.APLW No. 42 of 2026

2026-02-24

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

Mr.P.L.Narayanan for Mr.E.Hariharan for M/s.PLN Associates, Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Mr.A.Arun Babu

J.H.Najumudeen

R.Mohan, The State Of Tamilnadu, The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, The District Revenue Officer, The Zonal Officer, The Tahsildar, M/s. JHN Shasanem Trade Center Private Limited, B.Lakshminarayanan, B.Udayasuriyan, B.Mayurapriyan, B.Premkumar, K.Pramila, C.Seethalakshmi, C.Balasubramanian, C.Mahalakshmi, S.V.Ravi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition seeking correction of a clerical error in a writ order.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought insertion of the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' in paragraph 4 of the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024.

Filing Reason

To correct a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024.

Previous Decisions

The order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024 was passed by the same bench.

Issues

Whether the review petition is maintainable for correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner submitted that there is a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024, and the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' was omitted after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' in paragraph 4. The respondents did not oppose the correction.

Ratio Decidendi

A review petition is maintainable for correction of a clerical or arithmetical error apparent on the face of the record, and such correction can be made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to give effect to the original intention of the court.

Judgment Excerpts

The review petition is allowed. The clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 in WP.No.4455 of 2024 is corrected by inserting the phrase 'in respect of the gifted land' after the words 'dated 22.07.1971 any subsequent alienation' in paragraph 4.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP.No.4455 of 2024, which was disposed of by order dated 05.01.2026. Subsequently, the petitioner filed this review petition (REV.APLW No. 42 of 2026) seeking correction of a clerical error in that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Protects Service of Assistant Teacher Who Gave Up Scheduled Tribe Privileges After Caste Validity Certificate for Special Backward Category Was Issued. Court Quashes Termination Notice and Allows Continuity of Service Subject to Und...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Review Petition to Correct Clerical Error in Writ Order Regarding Gifted Land. Court Held That Review Is Maintainable for Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.