Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Gangadhar s/o Papanna Allamwar, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the order of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Aurangabad, which had rejected his tribe claim. The petitioner sought employment benefits based on his claim of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed the Committee to produce the scrutiny record. Upon perusal, the Court found that the Committee's earlier decision was not in accordance with law and directed the Committee to reconsider the petitioner's claim on merits, without being influenced by the earlier order. The Court allowed the review application and set aside the Committee's earlier order, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Headnote
A) Review Jurisdiction - Maintainability - Review Application against Caste Scrutiny Committee order - The High Court entertained a review application against the order of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's tribe claim on merits, holding that the Committee's earlier order suffered from procedural irregularities. (Paras 1-3)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the review application against the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee is maintainable and whether the Committee should reconsider the petitioner's tribe claim.
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the review application, set aside the order of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, and directed the Committee to reconsider the petitioner's tribe claim on merits, without being influenced by the earlier order.
Law Points
- Review jurisdiction
- Caste Scrutiny Committee
- Natural justice
- Reconsideration of claim
Case Details
2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 11
Review Application No.152 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 3319 of 2009
A.H. Joshi, Sunil P. Deshmukh
Mr.S.M. Vibhute for petitioner; Mr.K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos.4 and 6; Mr. P.S. Patil for respondent no.1
Gangadhar s/o. Papanna Allamwar
The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Aurangabad; The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg; The Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Sindhudurg (Adm.); The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samit Malwan, Dist. Sindhudurg
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Review application against order of Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee rejecting petitioner's tribe claim.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought review of the Committee's order and direction to reconsider his tribe claim.
Filing Reason
The petitioner's tribe claim was rejected by the Committee, and he sought review before the High Court.
Previous Decisions
The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee had rejected the petitioner's tribe claim.
Issues
Whether the review application is maintainable?
Whether the Committee's order suffers from procedural irregularities?
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that the Committee's order was not in accordance with law.
Respondents opposed the review application.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that the Committee's earlier order suffered from procedural irregularities and directed reconsideration on merits.
Judgment Excerpts
We had directed the Committee to make available the record of the scrutiny of petitioner's Tribe Claim.
Rule is made returnable forthwith and is heard with consent of the parties.
Procedural History
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 3319 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, which was disposed of with a direction to the Committee to produce the record. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Review Application No.152 of 2010, which was heard and allowed on 17th July 2013.
Acts & Sections
