Search Results for "express sanction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "express sanction"

1239 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1239 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Offence Under Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Non-Cognizable but Police May Arrest Without Warrant if Offence Committed in Presence. Driving Under Influence of Alcohol is a Serious Offence but Classification Under Part II of First Schedule CrPC Makes it Non-Cognizable as Punishment is Less Than Three Years.

28 Nov 2013

The applicant, Ms. Rani Shashank Doshi, was driving a motor vehicle on 27 April 2011 when she was stopped by a police officer from N.M. Joshi Marg Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Retirement at 60 Years Under Government Resolution. Government Resolution dated 27th October 1994 Raising Retirement Age to 60 Years Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad Employees as They Are Not Government Servants.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Shaligram Laxman Wakate, was an Assistant Teacher in a Zilla Parishad School in Warodi, Akola. He was born on 17th July 1938 and appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trusteeship in Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust Dispute. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove valid appointment as trustees and that the suit was barred by limitation and lacked cause of action.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, nine individuals, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that they are trustees of the Breach Candy Swimming Bath...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.

10 Feb 2015

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Defendant Directors in NSEL Suit for Lack of Averments and Immunity Under IFC Act. The court held that vague allegations without specific averments do not constitute a cause of action, and an IFC employee is immune from suit for official acts under the International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958.

23 Sep 2015

The Bombay High Court disposed of two notices of motion filed by Defendant Nos. 14 and 15 in a suit by National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) against v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Amount Under Joint Note. The court held that the three-day condition imposed by the bank was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that the petitioner's substantive right to pension could not be defeated by a procedural technicality.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not considering this principle under the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession and declaration of title filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Approval of Peon Appointment in Private School, Overturns Education Officer's Rejection Based on Procedural Issues and Ban

2 Feb 2026

The petitioners, including a school management and an appointed peon, filed a writ petition challenging the Education Officer's rejection of approval ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance in Cheque Bounce Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Petitioners/accused failed to show any illegality in the order of taking cognizance under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the revisional order rejecting their challenge.

22 Jan 2026

The petitioners, who are the accused in a cheque dishonour case, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)