Case Note & Summary
The petitioners, including a school management and an appointed peon, filed a writ petition challenging the Education Officer's rejection of approval for the peon's appointment -- The appointment was made in 2014 after the Education Officer failed to respond to the school's application for permission -- The rejection was based on a post-appointment ban, non-submission of documents, and staffing pattern changes -- The High Court framed three points for consideration, ruling that the ban does not apply retrospectively, the Education Officer's inaction does not invalidate the appointment, and policy transitions do not affect valid appointments -- The Court allowed the petition, directing approval of the appointment, and set aside the impugned order
Headnote
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, allowed Writ Petition No.6812 of 2024, directing the Education Officer to approve the appointment of petitioner no.3 as Peon -- The Court held that the ban imposed by Government Resolution post-appointment does not invalidate the approval proposal -- The Education Officer's failure to respond to the school's application does not vitiate the appointment made following requisite procedure without fraud -- Changes in staffing patterns during policy transition do not affect appointments made validly -- The appointment was made in 2014 for a Scheduled Caste reserved post, and the proposal rejection in 2022 was set aside -- The Court emphasized compliance with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules Act, 1981
Premium Content
The Headnote is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access key legal points
Issue of Consideration: The Issue of consideration mentioned in the Judgement is whether the Education Officer's rejection of the appointment approval proposal was justified based on the ban and procedural lapses
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, set aside the impugned order dated 27.10.2022, and directed the Education Officer to approve the appointment of petitioner no.3 as Peon with all consequential benefits
