Search Results for "block development officer"

1310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Divorce Case, Dismisses Wife's Petition for Certiorari. Family Court's Order Restoring Divorce Petition to File Set Aside Due to Lack of Notice to Husband.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions arising from a matrimonial dispute between Mr. Harmeet Singh (husband) and Mrs. Juliet Kukreja (wife). The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Divorce Case, Dismisses Wife's Petition for Certiorari. Family Court's Order Restoring Petition to File and Directing Fresh Notice Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from matrimonial proceedings between Mr. Harmeet Singh (husband) and Mrs. Juliet Kukreja (wife) in G and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disqualification of APMC Member for Non-Attendance of Meetings — Section 17(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 Requires Prior Notice of Meetings to Member Before Disqualification.

The petitioner, Sri Jayaram, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Yeshwanthapura, Bengaluru, from Jigani-7 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sanjay Gopalrao Wangikar, an Extension Officer in the Social Welfare Section of Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, was convicted by the Special ...