Search Results for "Municipal Corporation Resolution"

1423 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1423 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Petition in Industrial Dispute Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Employee. Labour Court's award under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 modified as compensation was inadequate for terminated employees of merged municipality.

The petitioners, three employees of Vejalpur Nagarpalika, were appointed as Rojamdar Employees in 2003 and later worked as Assistant Clerks from 2009....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Order Quashing MPSC Selection Process for Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster. Court Held That MPSC's Failure to Maintain 200-Point Roster for Backlog Vacancies Violated Constitutional Mandate Under Articles 16(4) and 16(4B).

The case involves multiple review petitions and a contempt petition arising from a writ petition filed by Makrand Subhash Dagadkhair challenging the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Approval of Teacher Appointment in Grant-in-Aid School. Petitioner's Appointment as Drawing Teacher Approved with Salary from Date School Received Grant-in-Aid.

The petitioner, Mrs. Swati Satish Nazare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to respondent No.2 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Metro Line 4 Alignment and Land Acquisition by Private Landowners. Petitioners Contend That MMRDA Lacks Authority Under Metro Railways Act, 1978 and That Acquisition Under MRTP Act Is Invalid Without Environmental Clearances.

Two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the implementation and alignment of Metro Railway Line No.4 (ML-4) in Mumbai. P...