Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1049 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Resumption of Allotted Land. Concurrent findings of fact regarding non-compliance with conditions of allotment upheld.

The petitioner, Shikalgar Co-operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition in 2000 challenging two orders: one dated 06.03.1999 passed by the Colle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Trust's Appeal Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment — Upholds High Court's Decision Based on Subsequent Developments and Consent Terms. The Court declined to interfere as the plot had been validly allotted to another trust under a settlement approved by the High Court.

The appellant, JVPD Scheme Welfare Trust, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, applied for allotment of a plot in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Concluded Contract. Document lacking vendor's signature and containing incomplete terms cannot be enforced under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the trial court's decree for specific performance of an alleged agreement to sell dated 1st October 20...