Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

1026 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1026 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance of Temple Land Restoration Order — Finds No Wilful Disobedience Due to Ongoing Administrative Process and Legal Hurdles. The court held that mere delay or difficulty in compliance does not amount to contempt unless there is wilful and deliberate disobedience.

27 Feb 2026

The contempt petition was filed by A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 23.10.2019 in WP(MD)No.64 of 2018...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

23 Oct 2019

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Revocation of Factory Permit Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 394(5) of MMC Act, 1888. Court held that the impugned order rejecting renewal of factory permit is appealable under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and thus writ petition is not maintainable.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioners, M/s Formac Engineering Ltd & Anr, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

23 Aug 2021

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 against arbitral award filed beyond limitation period under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable as efficacious alternative remedy exists.

27 Oct 2020

The Central Railway (Petitioner) awarded a contract to Maharashtra Steel Fabricators & Erectors (Respondent) on 31 December 2001 and 31 March 2002 for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against Ex-Director for Company Dues — No Personal Liability Without Statutory Provision. Section 142(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 does not authorise recovery from a former director who ceased to be associated with the company before the demand.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old senior citizen, was formerly a director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later renamed PDG Infotech Li...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

7 Apr 2026

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Demand Notice Issued to Former Director for Recovery of Company's Customs Dues. Director Not Personally Liable for Tax Arrears Under Section 142 of Customs Act, 1962, Absent Statutory Provision.

15 Feb 2019

The case involved a writ petition filed by Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old former director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later known as PDG Infotec...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)