Search Results for "Effective Communication"

1653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Workers' Union Seeking Impleadment of Holding Company in Industrial Dispute. Holding Company Not a Necessary Party in Reference Proceedings Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Globe Ground India Employees Union, filed an industrial dispute challenging the closure of M/s Globe Ground India Private Ltd. (second ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Accused's Appeal for Cloned Copy of Memory Card in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Victim's Privacy. Electronic Record Held to be 'Document' Under Evidence Act and IPC, Entitling Accused to Copy Under Section 207 CrPC.

The appellant, P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep, was arrayed as accused No. 8 in a case registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Splendor Complex. Unauthorized structures built in violation of sanctioned plans and DCR are liable for demolition under Section 53 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The case involves six writ petitions filed by residents of Splendor Complex, JVLR, Andheri (East), Mumbai, challenging the demolition of certain struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...