Search Results for "summoning order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "summoning order"

796 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 796 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Appellants in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Allegations Do Not Attract Provisions of Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

9 Apr 2019

The present appeal was filed by Raju @ Rajendra Dashrath Khaire and Mahendra @ Anna Rajendra Khaire against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Found to be Vague and Not Made in Public View, Attracting Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

30 Apr 2019

The present appeal was filed by four appellants against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their application for pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 does not apply when the allegations do not prima facie disclose an intention to humiliate the complainant on the ground of caste, and the incident arose from a trivial quarrel over a dog barking.

6 Nov 2019

The appellant, Jayshree @ Jaya Jagdishlal Jaiswal, was the original accused No. 3 in Crime No. 186 of 2019 registered at Kadim Jalna Police Station, D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-Summoning of Panch Witness for Cross-Examination in Criminal Trial — Right to Cross-Examine Not Extinguished by Witness Absence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine a prosecution witness cannot be denied due to the witness's absence, and directed fresh summons to be issued.

12 Apr 2005

The applicants (accused) filed a criminal application challenging the trial court's order rejecting their application to issue summons to a prosecutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant One Final Opportunity to Lead Evidence in Eviction Suit Subject to Costs. The court set aside the trial court's order closing evidence and directed one final opportunity to lead evidence, following the principle in Kewal Krishan v. Harnek Singh.

25 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Elesh Khara, a tenant in eviction proceedings, challenged the order dated 25.2.2014 passed by the Additional Small Causes Court, Nagpu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was not committed within its jurisdiction as the cheque was presented and dishonoured outside Maharashtra.

11 Dec 2025

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No. 514...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Clubbing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Project Dispute to Prevent Multiplicity of Proceedings. Court directs transfer of all FIRs to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, former directors of M/s Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking clubbing or tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Intention. Mere dishonour of cheque does not attract Section 420 IPC without proof of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the time of borrowing.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 86/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry. Magistrate failed to conduct mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.

25 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Kunal Rajesh Kothari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 19th January 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Quashes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Award in Motor Vehicles Act Claim Due to Non-Involvement of Driver. The Court held that a finding of negligence cannot be recorded without the driver being made a party either as respondent or witness, as per principles laid down in Machindranath Kernath Kasar v. D. S. Mylarappa, (2008) 13 SCC 198.

11 Sep 2017

This first appeal arose from a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the dependents of deceased Shindhu, who died ...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)