Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry. Magistrate failed to conduct mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kunal Rajesh Kothari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 19th January 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Solapur, issuing process against him for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Viral Suresh Desai, alleged that the petitioner issued two cheques dated 8th July 2015 for Rs.55,00,000 and Rs.5,25,000, which were deposited on 29th July 2015 but dishonoured. After a demand notice, the amount was not paid, leading to a complaint on 9th October 2015. The Magistrate took cognizance and issued process. The sole ground raised by the petitioner was that the Magistrate failed to conduct an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which is mandatory when the accused resides outside the court's jurisdiction. The petitioner resides in Mumbai, while the complaint was filed in Solapur. The court examined the Roznama and found no evidence of any inquiry under Section 202 CrPC. The court held that the inquiry under Section 202 CrPC is mandatory before issuing process when the accused resides outside the jurisdiction. Since no such inquiry was conducted, the order issuing process was illegal and liable to be quashed. The court allowed the petition, quashed the process order, and remanded the matter to the Magistrate for fresh consideration after conducting an inquiry under Section 202 CrPC.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 202 Inquiry - Mandatory Inquiry Before Issuance of Process - Section 202 CrPC, 1973 - Where the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate, an inquiry under Section 202 CrPC is mandatory before issuing process. The Magistrate failed to conduct any such inquiry, rendering the process order illegal. (Paras 4-6)

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Issuance of Process - Section 138 NI Act, 1881 - The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed at Solapur, while the accused resides in Mumbai. The Magistrate issued process without holding an inquiry under Section 202 CrPC. Held that the order issuing process is quashed and set aside. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Magistrate can issue process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without conducting an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 19th January 2016 issuing process against the petitioner is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration after conducting an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Law Points

  • Section 202 CrPC mandatory inquiry
  • accused residing outside jurisdiction
  • cognizance without inquiry invalid
  • Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 85

Criminal Writ Petition No.1541 of 2016

2018-06-25

Prakash D. Naik

Mr.Rishi Bhuta for Petitioner; Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State; Mr.P.G. Sarda for Respondent No.2

Kunal Rajesh Kothari

The State of Maharashtra; Viral Suresh Desai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging the order issuing process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 19th January 2016 issuing process against the petitioner.

Filing Reason

The Magistrate issued process without conducting an inquiry under Section 202 CrPC, which is mandatory when the accused resides outside the court's jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Solapur, issued process on 19th January 2016.

Issues

Whether the Magistrate can issue process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without conducting an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Magistrate failed to conduct an inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing process, which is mandatory as the accused resides in Mumbai, outside the jurisdiction of the Solapur court. Respondent-State and complainant opposed the petition, but the court found no evidence of inquiry in the Roznama.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates an inquiry before issuing process when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate. Failure to conduct such inquiry renders the process order illegal and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The only ground which is raised challenging the issuing process by the petitioner is that the trial Court had taken cognizance of the complaint without taking recourse to inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is submitted that on perusal of Roznama it can be seen that no inquiry as mandated under Section 202 of Cr.P.C. was conducted by the trial Court.

Procedural History

The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed on 9th October 2015 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Solapur. The Magistrate issued process on 19th January 2016. The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1541 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court challenging the process order.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 202
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry. Magistrate failed to conduct mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking DRC in BBMP Land Acquisition Case — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement to Development Rights Certificate Under KTCP Act, 1961.