Supreme Court Allows Clubbing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Project Dispute to Prevent Multiplicity of Proceedings. Court directs transfer of all FIRs to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, former directors of M/s Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking clubbing or transfer of multiple FIRs registered against them in different jurisdictions. The FIRs arose from the same real estate project 'Brahma City/Krrish World', where the company accepted bookings from homebuyers but failed to deliver possession due to delays beyond their control. The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police had already registered FIR No. 30/2019 clubbing complaints of 83 homebuyers, and later 28 more complaints were added. However, other FIRs were registered in different police stations across Haryana and Delhi. The petitioners argued that multiple proceedings would cause harassment and abuse of process. The Supreme Court, considering the facts and the need to avoid multiplicity, allowed the petition and directed that all FIRs be transferred to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation. The court held that the interests of justice require clubbing of cases arising from the same transaction to prevent conflicting findings and unnecessary burden on the accused.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Clubbing of FIRs - Transfer of Cases - Multiple FIRs arising from same transaction - Petitioners sought clubbing/transfer of FIRs registered in different jurisdictions pertaining to same real estate project 'Brahma City/Krrish World' - Court allowed the petition and directed transfer of all FIRs to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation - Held that to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and abuse of process, all FIRs be investigated by EOW Delhi (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether multiple FIRs registered against the petitioners in different jurisdictions arising out of the same real estate project transactions should be clubbed and transferred to one investigating agency to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the writ petition and directed that all FIRs registered against the petitioners in different jurisdictions pertaining to the real estate project 'Brahma City/Krrish World' be transferred to the Economic Offence Wing (EOW), New Delhi for consolidated investigation.

Law Points

  • Clubbing of FIRs
  • Transfer of cases
  • Multiplicity of proceedings
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Section 406 IPC
  • Section 420 IPC
  • Section 120B IPC
  • Article 32 Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 INSC 509

Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 67/2025

0000-00-00

Prasanna B. Varale

2026 INSC 509

Amit Katyal & Anr.

State of Haryana & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking clubbing/transfer of multiple FIRs registered against the petitioners in different jurisdictions arising out of the same real estate project transactions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions for clubbing/transfer of multiple FIRs to one investigating agency to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Filing Reason

Multiple FIRs were registered against the petitioners in different police stations in Delhi and Haryana arising from the same real estate project 'Brahma City/Krrish World', causing multiplicity of proceedings and harassment.

Issues

Whether multiple FIRs arising from the same transaction should be clubbed and transferred to one investigating agency to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that multiple FIRs in different jurisdictions on the same subject matter cause harassment and abuse of process. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioners' plea.

Ratio Decidendi

To avoid multiplicity of proceedings and abuse of process of law, multiple FIRs arising from the same transaction should be clubbed and investigated by one agency.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the petitioners seeking appropriate directions from this Court for clubbing/transfer of multiple First Information Reports registered against them in different jurisdictions, arising out of the same set of transactions pertaining to the real estate project 'Brahma City/Krrish World'. Out of several FIRs, an FIR No. 30/2019 was registered by Economic Offence Wing of Delhi Police (EOW), in which the complaints made by 83 homebuyers/victims were clubbed and investigated.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court seeking clubbing/transfer of multiple FIRs. The court heard the matter and passed the order allowing the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420, 120B
  • Constitution of India: Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Clubbing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Project Dispute to Prevent Multiplicity of Proceedings. Court directs transfer of all FIRs to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in MAT Computation Case — Capital Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets Cannot Be Added to Book Profit Under Section 115JB When Not Credited to Profit and Loss Account. The Court held that the Assessing Officer can...