Search Results for "ordinary law sufficient"

4787 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4787 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shahrukh @ Chhotu Ramlal Sonkusre, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Santosh Manikrao Khirekar under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Injunction in Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Similarity of marks alone insufficient for interim relief when defendant has used its registered mark for nearly a decade without evidence of confusion.

The plaintiff, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Wockhardt Ltd and Overseas African Remedie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...