Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests, which was contrary to the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum, and that the award of costs was without reasons.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 15th October 2011 passed under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. The dispute arose from a loan advanced by The Memon Co-operative Bank Ltd. (respondent no.1) to Mr. Amarlal Ramchand Gera (since deceased, represented by his wife Smt. Prema Amarlal Gera) and guaranteed by Mr. Rajan Ramchand Gera. The bank claimed that the loan was not repaid, leading to arbitration. The arbitrator awarded the bank a sum of Rs. 12,00,000 with interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests from the date of the award until realization, and costs of Rs. 50,000. Both the borrower's legal heir (Smt. Prema Amarlal Gera) and the guarantor (Rajan Ramchand Gera) filed separate petitions challenging the award. The main legal issues were whether the arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction by awarding interest at a rate higher than the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum, whether the award of costs was justified, and whether the guarantor was liable. The court analyzed the loan agreement and found that the contractual rate was 16.5% per annum with quarterly rests. The court held that the arbitrator could not award interest exceeding the contractual rate, as doing so would be patently illegal and against public policy. The court also set aside the award of costs of Rs. 50,000 as the arbitrator gave no reasons for the quantum. However, the court upheld the liability of the guarantor, finding that the guarantee deed was valid and the guarantor was liable for the principal amount. The court partially allowed both petitions, modifying the award to reduce the interest rate to 16.5% per annum with quarterly rests from the date of the award until realization, and deleting the costs. The rest of the award was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Challenge to Arbitral Award - Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 84 Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - The court considered petitions challenging an arbitral award on grounds of excess of jurisdiction and patent illegality. The arbitrator had awarded interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests, which was contrary to the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum. The court held that the arbitrator could not award interest exceeding the contractual rate and set aside the interest portion. (Paras 1-10)

B) Arbitration - Interest Rate - Contractual Rate vs. Awarded Rate - The loan agreement provided for interest at 16.5% per annum with quarterly rests. The arbitrator awarded 24% per annum with quarterly rests. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction by awarding a rate higher than the contractual rate, and such award was patently illegal and against public policy. (Paras 11-20)

C) Arbitration - Costs - Award of Costs Without Reasons - The arbitrator awarded costs of Rs. 50,000 without providing any reasons. The court held that the award of costs was arbitrary and set it aside, as the arbitrator failed to give any justification for the quantum. (Paras 21-25)

D) Arbitration - Guarantor Liability - The court upheld the liability of the guarantor (petitioner in ARBP 207/2012) as the guarantor had signed the guarantee deed and was liable for the principal amount. The court found no infirmity in the award regarding the guarantor's liability. (Paras 26-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arbitral award dated 15th October, 2011 under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 is liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on grounds of the arbitrator exceeding jurisdiction, patent illegality, and conflict with public policy, particularly regarding the rate of interest, costs, and liability of the guarantor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both arbitration petitions are partly allowed. The impugned arbitral award is modified to the extent that the rate of interest awarded at 24% per annum with quarterly rests is reduced to 16.5% per annum with quarterly rests from the date of the award until realization. The award of costs of Rs. 50,000 is set aside. The rest of the award is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act
  • 2002
  • Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act
  • Interest rate
  • Guarantor liability
  • Costs
  • Jurisdiction of arbitrator
  • Public policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (01) 20

Arbitration Petition No. 207 of 2012 and Arbitration Petition No. 1345 of 2012

2017-01-27

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr. Suresh Firodiya i/b Mr. Harshad Sathe for Petitioner in ARBP 207/2012 and Respondent no.2 in ARBP 1345/2012; Mr. Jayesh Patel a/w Mr. Dewang Khira for Respondent no.1 in both petitions; Mr. Rumi Mirza for Petitioner in ARBP 1345/2012 and Respondent no.2 in ARBP 207/2012

Smt. Prema Amarlal Gera (in ARBP 207/2012) and Rajan Ramchand Gera (in ARBP 1345/2012)

The Memon Co-operative Bank Ltd. through the Liquidator and Rajan Ramchand Gera (in ARBP 207/2012) / The Memon Co-operative Bank Ltd. through the Liquidator and Mrs. Prema Amarlal Gera (in ARBP 1345/2012)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenges to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the arbitral award dated 15th October 2011.

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests contrary to the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum, and awarded costs without reasons.

Previous Decisions

The arbitral award dated 15th October 2011 was passed by the learned arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.

Issues

Whether the arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests when the contractual rate was 16.5% per annum? Whether the award of costs of Rs. 50,000 without reasons is sustainable? Whether the guarantor is liable under the guarantee deed?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the arbitrator acted beyond the scope of the agreement by awarding interest at a rate higher than the contractual rate, which is patently illegal and against public policy. The petitioners also argued that the award of costs was arbitrary and without any justification. The respondent bank argued that the arbitrator had discretion to award interest and that the rate was justified given the default.

Ratio Decidendi

An arbitrator cannot award interest at a rate higher than the contractual rate of interest, as doing so would be patently illegal and against the public policy of India. The award of costs without reasons is arbitrary and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

By these two arbitration petitions filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (for short 'the Arbitration Act') the petitioner in both the aforesaid two petitions have impugned the arbitral award declared on 15th October, 2011 by the learned arbitrator under section 84 of the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (for short 'the said Act of 2002'). The court held that the arbitrator could not award interest exceeding the contractual rate and set aside the interest portion.

Procedural History

The Memon Co-operative Bank Ltd. filed a claim before the arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 against the borrower and guarantor. The arbitrator passed an award on 15th October 2011. The borrower's legal heir (Smt. Prema Amarlal Gera) filed Arbitration Petition No. 207 of 2012, and the guarantor (Rajan Ramchand Gera) filed Arbitration Petition No. 1345 of 2012, both under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Both petitions were heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 34
  • Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002: Section 84
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per ann...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industr...