Search Results for "interlocutory"

1978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Impounding Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not Required to Be Stamped as Conveyance. Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Set Aside as Agreement of Sale Is Not a Deed of Conveyance Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioner, Vinod Sequeira, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order to Pay Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 — Held That Only the Person Who Executed or First Received the Instrument Can Be Directed to Pay Stamp Duty and Penalty

The petitioner, defendant No.3 in O.S.No.8/2010, challenged an interlocutory order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the trial court directing him to pay sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand for ₹215.75 Crores for Unlawful Mining of Iron Ore. Petitioner's Mining Lease Renewal Deemed Granted Under Section 8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Extraction Was Lawful.

The petitioner, M/s Deepchand Kishenlal, a registered partnership firm, held a mining lease originally granted in 1954 for manganese ore and kaolin, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Regular Appeal — Section 104(2) CPC Does Not Bar Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Order Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Passed in a Regular Appeal.

The appellant, Sri Madhava Prabhu, filed Regular Appeal No.43/2015 before the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi. In that appeal, he fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...