Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1049 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 150 per sq.mt with Additional Benefits. Claimants entitled to 12% additional market value under Section 23(1A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which was erroneously denied by Reference Court.

10 Apr 2012

The case involves two appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for extension of Civil Hospital in Solapur. The property, CTS No.617 1B admeas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That ULC Act Proceedings Lapsed Upon Repeal — Land in Village Drugdhamna Not Vested in State as Possession Not Taken Prior to Repeal Act, 1999. The court held that under Section 3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, proceedings under the ULC Act lapse if possession of the land has not been taken before the repeal, and the land does not vest in the State.

7 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sunilkumar Motilal Sharma, Sushilkumar Motilal Sharma, Subhashkumar Ratanlal Sharma, and the legal representatives of Smt. Sunita Ume...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Passage and Gate. Trial Court Failed to Consider Leave Application Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Before Granting Interim Relief.

25 Jul 2006

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Respondents 1 to 4 (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant No.1) and the Municipal Corporation (defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging TAC Report on Building's Structural Stability — Expert Technical Opinion Not Amenable to Judicial Review on Merits. Writ Court Cannot Substitute Its Own View on Technical Matters; TAC Guidelines from MCGM v State of Maharashtra Followed.

5 Mar 2024

The petitioners, six tenants of a chawl in Bhiwandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the report of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Modification of Deemed Conveyance Certificate by Competent Authority Under MOFA. Functus Officio Doctrine Not Applicable to Corrective Orders; Competent Authority Can Modify Certificate to Specify Proportionate Share in Recreational Ground and Exact Survey Numbers.

15 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shree Rasraj Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Petitioner in WP-6008/2026) and M/s. Brij Bu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

13 Dec 2010

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Amey Cooperative Housing Society in Navi Mumbai — No Violation of FSI or Development Control Regulations Found. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or violation of law, and the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans.

18 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sandeep Thakur challenging the construction of the Amey Cooperative Housin...

High Court

KAHC010000532013_1

16 Mar 2021

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under Slum Act for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) — Acquisition of Petitioner's Land by Deputy Collector Set Aside for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, NESCO Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of its land bearing CT...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)