Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Modification of Deemed Conveyance Certificate by Competent Authority Under MOFA. Functus Officio Doctrine Not Applicable to Corrective Orders; Competent Authority Can Modify Certificate to Specify Proportionate Share in Recreational Ground and Exact Survey Numbers.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shree Rasraj Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Petitioner in WP-6008/2026) and M/s. Brij Builders (Petitioner in WP-6024/2026) challenging an order dated 12 January 2026 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-4 (Competent Authority). The Competent Authority allowed a Miscellaneous Application filed by Respondent No.1-Society (Devendra Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.) and modified the description of property conveyed vide Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance dated 4 May 2017. The modification indicated the area of proportionate share in the Recreational Ground (RG) and specified the exact land in the Survey Numbers conveyed in favour of Respondent No.1-Society. The petitioners argued that the Competent Authority had become functus officio after passing the order dated 4 May 2017 and could not modify the certificate. The court examined the provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA) and the powers of the Competent Authority. The court held that the Competent Authority does not become functus officio after issuing a deemed conveyance certificate and retains jurisdiction to correct errors or omissions to give effect to the true intent of the conveyance. The court found that the modification was necessary to specify the proportionate share in the recreational ground and the exact survey numbers, which were part of the land conveyed. The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the order of the Competent Authority. The decision emphasizes that the power to convey includes the power to correct or modify the certificate to reflect the legal entitlement of the society.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Housing Society - Deemed Conveyance - Modification of Certificate - Functus Officio - The Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 does not become functus officio after issuing a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance and retains jurisdiction to modify the certificate to correct errors or omissions, such as specifying the exact land area and proportionate share in recreational ground. Held that the power to convey includes the power to correct or modify the conveyance to reflect the true intent and legal entitlement. (Paras 1-10)

B) Cooperative Housing Society - Recreational Ground - Proportionate Share - The Competent Authority can modify the description of property conveyed to include the proportionate share in the Recreational Ground (RG) area, as such area is part of the land conveyed under the deemed conveyance. Held that the modification was necessary to give effect to the rights of the society. (Paras 1-10)

C) Cooperative Housing Society - Survey Numbers - Specification of Land - The Competent Authority can specify the exact survey numbers of the land conveyed in the certificate of deemed conveyance, even if not originally mentioned, to avoid ambiguity. Held that such specification is a permissible correction. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 becomes functus officio after issuing a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance and can subsequently modify the certificate to correct errors or omissions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The order dated 12 January 2026 passed by the Competent Authority is upheld.

Law Points

  • Functus officio doctrine
  • Deemed conveyance
  • Modification of certificate
  • Recreational ground
  • Proportionate share
  • Competent Authority powers
  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction
  • Sale
  • Management and Transfer) Act
  • 1963
  • Section 11
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 9

Writ Petition No. 6008 of 2026 and Writ Petition No. 6024 of 2026

2026-07-15

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

Mr. Nirman Sharma with Ms. Uma Sharma i/b. Dharam & Co. for Petitioner in WP-6008/2026; Mr. Akshay Doctor i/b. Mr. Sachin Choudhari for Petitioner in WP-6024/2026; Mr. Shanay Shah with Ms. Janhavee Joshi and Mr. Maulik Vora i/b. Pramodkumar & Co. for Respondent No.1 in both petitions; Ms. Sulbha D. Chipade, AGP for Respondent-State in both petitions.

Shree Rasraj Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (WP-6008/2026) and M/s. Brij Builders (WP-6024/2026)

Devendra Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City (4), Smt. Chandrakanta Vijendra Sharma, Mr. Bharatbhushan Vijendra Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Vijendra Sharma, Smt. Pushpa Surendra Sharma, Mr. Sanjay Surendra Sharma, M/s. Brij Builders (in WP-6008/2026); and Devendra Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City (4), Mr. Bharatbhushan Vijendra Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Vijendra Sharma, Smt. Pushpa Surendra Sharma, Mr. Sanjay Surendra Sharma, Mrs. Sudha Wd/o. Narendra Sharma, Mr. Yogesh s/o. Narendra Sharma, Shree Rasraj Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (in WP-6024/2026)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging an order of the Competent Authority modifying a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 12 January 2026 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-4 allowing modification of the deemed conveyance certificate.

Filing Reason

The petitioners contended that the Competent Authority had become functus officio after issuing the deemed conveyance certificate on 4 May 2017 and could not modify it.

Previous Decisions

Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance dated 4 May 2017 was issued in favour of Respondent No.1-Society. Subsequently, on 12 January 2026, the Competent Authority allowed a Miscellaneous Application to modify the certificate to include proportionate share in Recreational Ground and specify exact survey numbers.

Issues

Whether the Competent Authority under MOFA becomes functus officio after issuing a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance. Whether the Competent Authority can modify the certificate to correct errors or omissions such as specifying proportionate share in recreational ground and exact survey numbers.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Competent Authority became functus officio after passing the order dated 4 May 2017 and could not modify the certificate. Respondent No.1-Society argued that the modification was necessary to give effect to the true intent of the conveyance and that the Competent Authority retains jurisdiction to correct errors.

Ratio Decidendi

The Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 does not become functus officio after issuing a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance and retains the power to modify the certificate to correct errors or omissions, including specifying the proportionate share in recreational ground and exact survey numbers, as such modifications are necessary to give effect to the true intent of the conveyance.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Petitions, the Petitioner-Society has challenged order dated 12 January 2026 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-4 and the Competent Authority allowing Misc. Application filed by Respondent No.1-Society and modifying the description of the property conveyed vide Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance dated 4 May 2017 by indicating the area of proportionate share in the Recreational Ground (RG), as well as by specifying the exact land in the Survey Numbers conveyed in favour of Respondent No.1-Society. The order dated 12 January 2026 is challenged in both the Petitions essentially on the ground that the Competent Authority had become functus officio after passing of the order dated 4 May 2017 and could not have modified the Certificate.

Procedural History

The Competent Authority issued a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance on 4 May 2017 in favour of Respondent No.1-Society. Thereafter, Respondent No.1-Society filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking modification of the certificate to include proportionate share in Recreational Ground and specify exact survey numbers. The Competent Authority allowed the application on 12 January 2026. Aggrieved, the Petitioner-Society and the developer filed separate writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, which were heard together and dismissed on 15 July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes Contempt Petitions Against Union of India for Non-Payment of Arrears to TV News Correspondents. Court Directed Payment of Arrears by Specific Deadlines and Extended Benefits to Similarly Situated TV Assistant News Editors Witho...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Director of Education's Petition in School Education Act Case — Management's Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Impose Major Penalty Held Not Maintainable. Only an aggrieved employee can appeal under Section ...