Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MSEDCL Tender Process for Composite Power Procurement. Court holds that tender conditions requiring composite bids for thermal and solar power are valid and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, the General Secretary of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in CRZ Area Due to Suppression of Facts and Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, not being owner of land, cannot challenge demolition; suppression of earlier proceedings disentitles relief.

The petitioner, Nandlal Khemka, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on survey no. 46/1 at Candolim, Bardez, Goa. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes IBBI Circular as Ultra Vires in Insolvency Professional Regulation — Circular Purporting to Clarify Regulation 4(2)(b) of LP Regulations Held to Be an Impermissible Retrospective Amendment.

The petitioner, Amit Gupta, a chartered accountant and registered insolvency professional, challenged a circular dated 28 September 2023 issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notice for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice in Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 — Notice Issued Without Prior Hearing Violates Section 55A and Principles of Audi Alteram Partem.

The Bombay High Court, in a common judgment, allowed two writ petitions challenging a notice dated January 6, 2017, issued by the Under Secretary to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Fishermen Cooperative's Petition Against Demolition of Fishermen Huts in Coastal Zone. Court Holds That Traditional Fishing Communities Have Customary Rights to Occupy Foreshore Land for Livelihood, Subject to Environmental Clearances Under CRZ Notification, 2011.

The petitioner, Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society of traditional fishermen, filed a writ petition challenging the pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...