Search Results for "notification quash"

1982 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1982 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Corruption Case Against Judicial Officer. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Not Required at FIR Stage.

The petitioner, Sharanappa, a judicial officer in the cadre of Senior Civil Judge, was under suspension on allegations of demanding and accepting a br...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Foreign Trade Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction. Proceedings Initiated Without Mandatory Sanction Under Section 61 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 Are Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, N. Mruthunjaya @ Muthu, was the accused in four criminal cases (C.C. Nos. 1221/2003, 1222/2003, 1223/2003, and 1224/2003) pending befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010026042017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents

The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitioners' Challenge to Bye-law Amendment Resolution and Order in Kolar Union Case Due to Alleged Procedural Impropriety. The Court Examines Admissibility of Video Evidence and Compliance with Section 12 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Background: The dispute arose from the bifurcation and merger of the Kolara-Chikkaballapura District Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...