Search Results for "Vague Averments"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Improper Complaint by Constituted Attorney. Complaint under Section 138 NI Act fails as attorney lacked personal knowledge and power of attorney was not proved.

The appellant, M/s. Amin Warehousing, a proprietary concern, filed a complaint through its constituted attorney against the respondent, Al Freight Int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Relied on Irrelevant Grounds, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The Bombay High Court delivered a common judgment in two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writs of habeas c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Plus 30-Day Condonation Window Without Sufficient Cause.

The petitioner, Logic Eastern India Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under Section 55 of MRTP Act — Appellant's Possession Based on Census Certificate and Prior Withdrawal of Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act Entitled to Interim Protection.

The appellant, Anil Sitaram Dubey, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 26 September 2016, which refused to grant a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Journalist's Compensation Claim for Handcuffing During Police Transit. No Violation of Articles 14 and 21 Found as Handcuffing Was Justified by Threat of Escape and No Malice Established.

The petitioner, Satish Banwarilal Sharma, a journalist and managing editor of a daily newspaper, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...