Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Charity Commissioner's Scheme in Trust Dispute. Court upholds exclusive jurisdiction of Charity Commissioner under Section 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 to frame scheme for public trust.

The petitioners, who were trustees of a trust, filed writ petitions challenging the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner framing a scheme for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court's Order and Allows Written Statement in Appeal Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. Industrial Court Must Permit Filing of Written Statement and Lead Evidence as Rule 13 of Bombay Rules Does Not Prohibit Pleadings in Appeal.

The writ petition arose from an appeal under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, pending before the Industrial Court. The managemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation Notification for Zilla Parishad President Elections. Petitioners Allege BCC and Women Seat Allocation Under Section 42 and 1962 Rules Violates Supreme Court Directives and Draw of Lots Mandate.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Mesne Profits Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Rate Fixed at Rs.1,24,099 per Month Based on Expert Evidence. Court Confirms That Mesne Profits Are Determined by Market Rent, Not Controlled Rent, and Interest at 6% p.a. Is Appropriate.

The case involves a dispute between Bata India Limited (the applicant/tenant) and Bindiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited (the respondent/landlor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...