Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Furlough Extension in Calendar Year Computation Case — Prison Authorities' Interpretation of 'Calendar Year' Held Incorrect. The court held that furlough leave spilling over from one calendar year cannot be deducted from the next year's entitlement under Rule 4(C)(4) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 374
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a life convict lodged at Yerawada Open Prison, Pune, filed a writ petition seeking extension of his furlough leave by 17 days. He had been granted 11 days of furlough in 2024 by order dated 01.08.2024, but claimed he was entitled to 28 days under Rule 4(C)(4) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, as he had completed more than five years of imprisonment. The prison authorities contended that he had already availed 17 days of furlough in 2024 from a previous leave that spilled over from 2023 (20.12.2023 to 18.01.2024), and thus only 11 days remained. The court examined the definition of 'calendar year' and held that it means the period from 1st January to 31st December. The leave availed in 2023, even if it extended into 2024, could not be counted against the 2024 entitlement. The court found the authorities' interpretation incorrect and allowed the petition, directing the respondents to release the petitioner on furlough for 17 days on the same conditions as the order dated 01.08.2024.

Headnote

A) Prisons Law - Furlough Leave - Calendar Year Computation - Rule 4 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - The court considered whether furlough leave that spills over from one calendar year to the next can be deducted from the prisoner's entitlement for the subsequent year. The court held that 'calendar year' means the period from 1st January to 31st December, and leave availed in a previous year cannot be counted against the next year's entitlement. The prison authorities' interpretation was incorrect. (Paras 5-9)

B) Prisons Law - Furlough Leave - Entitlement Period - Rule 4(C)(4) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - A prisoner who has completed more than five years of imprisonment is entitled to 28 days of furlough leave in a calendar year. The court held that the petitioner, having completed more than five years, was entitled to 28 days in 2024, and the 17 days that spilled over from 2023 could not be deducted. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether furlough leave granted in one calendar year that spills over into the next calendar year can be counted against the prisoner's entitlement for the subsequent calendar year.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on furlough leave for a period of 17 days on the same conditions as provided in the order dated 01.08.2024.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of 'calendar year' in furlough rules
  • Furlough leave spill-over cannot be counted against next year's entitlement
  • Rule 4 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules
  • 1959
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 136

Criminal Writ Petition (ST) No. 19317 of 2024

2024-11-13

Bharati Dangre, Manjusha Deshpande

2024:BHC-AS:44416-DB

Mr. N. N. Gawankar, Mr. Shreyas N. Gawankar, Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, Ms. Nisha Shreyakar

Stive @ Lisban John Miranda

The State of Maharashtra, The Superintendent, Yerawada Open Prison, Yerawada, Pune, The Deputy Inspector General (Prison), Western Region, Pune-6

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking extension of furlough leave.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent No.2 to release the petitioner on furlough leave for 17 days on same conditions as order dated 01.08.2024.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was granted only 11 days furlough in 2024 because authorities counted 17 days of spill-over from 2023 against his 2024 entitlement.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 01.08.2024 by Deputy Inspector General (Prison) granting 11 days furlough.

Issues

Whether furlough leave that spills over from one calendar year to the next can be counted against the prisoner's entitlement for the subsequent calendar year under Rule 4(C)(4) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: He is entitled to 28 days furlough in a calendar year as per Rule 4(C)(4) after completing 5 years of imprisonment. The 17 days that spilled over from 2023 cannot be deducted from 2024 entitlement. Respondent: Petitioner already availed 17 days furlough in 2024 from the spill-over leave, so only 11 days remain for 2024.

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'calendar year' in Rule 4(C)(4) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 means the period from 1st January to 31st December. Furlough leave availed in one calendar year, even if it spills over into the next, cannot be counted against the entitlement for the subsequent calendar year. The prison authorities' interpretation to the contrary is incorrect.

Judgment Excerpts

When the Rule has specifically prescribed the eligibility to avail the furlough leave with reference to a 'Calendar Year', it is expected that the prison authorities live upto the computation, which the rule making authority intended to be assigned to the said term. If the calendar year is a period which commences from 1st of January of a year and come to an end on 31st December of that particular year, the eligibility of the prisoner to avail the furlough for 28 days must be spread over for that period.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition (ST) No. 19317 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 01.08.2024 granting only 11 days furlough. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 13.11.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Prisons Act, 1894: Section 59(5), Section 59(28)
  • Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959: Rule 4, Rule 4(C)(4)
  • Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2018:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appeal of Non-Tribal Trader in Trading Regulation Case; Section 3 of Lushai Hills District (Trading by Non-Tribals) Regulation, 1953 Violative of Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution. Unguided Licensing Power of District Council Dee...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Defamation Case Against Newspaper Publisher and Editor for Reporting FIR — Reporting of Police Press Release Constitutes Fair Comment and Substantial Truth Under Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC.