downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"
1337 result(s) found
Found 1337 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.
20 Oct 2016The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Tenancy Dispute, Restores Orders of Agricultural Land Tribunal and SDO. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.
3 Nov 2025The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landholder Damodar, challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 Ma...
- 172
High Court
High Court Considers Maintainability and Exemption Issue in Writ Petition Against Tax Demand on Alleged Non-Export Sale. Interprets Section 5(3) of CST Act Regarding Penultimate Sale Deemed Export.
4 Aug 2014The petitioner, a manufacturer of submarine navy batteries, challenged orders demanding sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the ground t...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.
19 Mar 2012The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Construction of Shiv Chatrapati Sports Complex Held Not 'Commercial or Industrial Construction' Under Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994.
15 Mar 2019The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune-III filed an appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order date...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularization of Ad Hoc Lecturers in Government Engineering College. Ad Hoc Appointments Do Not Confer Right to Regularization for Gazetted Posts Requiring MPSC Selection.
28 Jun 2017The petitioners, four individuals appointed as ad hoc lecturers at the Government College of Engineering, Chandrapur, filed a writ petition challengin...
- 69
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.
18 Sep 2019The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...
- 235
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.
25 Feb 2022The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...
- 395
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Works Contractor's Petition Challenging MVAT Assessment on Offshore Platform — Transfer of Property Occurred Outside State of Maharashtra. The court held that the State of Maharashtra lacks jurisdiction to levy tax under the MVAT Act on goods transferred in execution of a works contract on an offshore platform located in the exclusive economic zone, as the transfer of property took place outside the State.
15 Jun 2022The petitioner, HAL Offshore Ltd., a public limited company and works contractor, challenged an assessment order passed under the Maharashtra Value Ad...
- 51
