CMA NO.2543 OF 2018
19 Feb 2025The dispute arose over the legal heirship and terminal benefits of deceased Sundaramoorthy, who worked as a clerk in the Corporation of Chennai and di...
Search Results for "defendant's right"
5886 result(s) found
Found 5886 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows NAFED's Chamber Summons for Return of Rs. 32 Crore Deposited in Suit, Dismisses Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion for Withdrawal. Court holds that NAFED is entitled to refund of deposit made under mistaken belief of liability, and plaintiffs cannot claim the amount as they have no decree or order in their favor.
13 Feb 2024The judgment arises out of three applications in Suit No. 121 of 2014 pending before the Bombay High Court. The plaintiffs, L.J. Tanna Enterprises Pvt...
- 116
High Court
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.
5 Nov 2014The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...
- 145
High Court
High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld
27 Feb 2026The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...
- 646
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Star Zing Marks Protected. Use of identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' by Defendant restrained as deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered trademarks.
8 Jan 2020The Plaintiff, Sky Enterprise Private Ltd., filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademarks and passing off by the Defen...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Trust Dispute — Suit for Injunction Against Former Trustee Not Barred Under Sections 50 and 51 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The court held that the bar under Sections 50 and 51 applies only to suits relating to administration of trust or appointment/removal of trustees, not to suits against a former trustee who has ceased to be a trustee.
26 Sep 2011The revision petition was filed by the original defendant, Vijay Raghurama Shetty, challenging an order of the City Civil Court, Bombay dated 01.07.20...
- 115
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; substantial questions of law not made out.
13 Apr 2017The appellant, Smt. Sathyamma, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 3.1...
- 101
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Transferee. The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a suit for declaration and injunction, as the plaintiff did not produce the will or power of attorney to establish ownership or possession.
10 Mar 2015The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit Challenging Deed of Additional Right of Way. Court holds that valuation for jurisdiction is determined by the plaintiff's valuation in the plaint, and the City Civil Court cannot go beyond the plaint allegations to determine pecuniary jurisdiction under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.
9 Nov 2023The appeal arises from an order dated 12 October 2022 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, allowing Notice of Motion No. 1797/2021 filed by...
- 67
