High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Unreasonable Delay"
1723 result(s) found
Found 1723 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...
- 675
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate Leads to Acquittal. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, vitiates the trial and entitles the accused to acquittal.
28 Jun 2023The case involves four criminal appeals filed by individuals convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Activities Found to Affect Law and Order Only, Not Public Order, Rendering Preventive Detention Invalid.
1 Aug 2023The petitioner, Pranali Yogesh Karkhandis, challenged a detention order dated 23rd January 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City, unde...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Doctors in Medical Negligence Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Gross Negligence or Culpable Homicide Under Sections 304, 304-A, 201, 176, 314, 197 r/w 34 IPC and Section 33(2) of Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961.
17 Mar 2020The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 22nd November 2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Male...
- 359
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Court upholds acquittal as evidence failed to establish that the accused insulted the complainant with intent to humiliate on caste basis under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
29 Nov 2011The revision application was filed by Sitaram Mahadu Dhadve, the original first informant, challenging the judgment and order dated 17th September 200...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 427 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
6 Jan 2012The appellant, Suyash Rajiv Mulukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 427 (mischief causing damage)...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2 Jul 2012The Union of India, through the Chief Project Manager (Conversion), Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Setting Aside Compensation Levy in Construction Contract Dispute. Levy of Compensation Under Clause 2 of GCC Invalid for Non-Compliance with Contractual Mechanism of Show Cause Notice and Quantification.
12 Mar 2019The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from a construction contract between the General Manager, Heavy Water Plant (Manuguru) (petiti...
- 119
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Not Liable to Pay Interest on Awarded Amount Due to Insurer's Failure to Defend. The court held that the insurer, having accepted the premium and failed to defend the claim, is liable to pay interest on the awarded amount, and the owner cannot be burdened with interest liability.
18 Nov 2013This appeal arises from a motor accident claim. The appellant, Pramodkumar Gupta, was the owner of the offending vehicle. The Motor Accident Claims Tr...
- 104
