Search Results for "Shipping"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Shipping"

785 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 785 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs & Service Tax in Customs Broker Licence Renewal Case — Non-Compliance with Regulation 5 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 Justifies Rejection of Renewal Application. The Court held that the Commissioner is entitled to seek information under Regulation 5 and the applicant must comply; failure to furnish information sought justifies rejection of the renewal application.

24 Jun 2015

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Service Tax against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs New Mangalore Port Trust to Consider 50% NMR Service for Pensionary Benefits Under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The court held that the respondent must consider the claim of a retired employee for counting 50% of his daily wage service as qualifying service for pension, based on a certificate of continuous service.

24 Jul 2015

The petitioner No.1, B. Vamana, was employed as a Mali-cum-Mazdoor on daily wages under Nominal Muster Roll (NMR) with the New Mangalore Port Trust (N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contained an arbitration clause, and thus appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the partners.

20 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Shri Prabhakar Reddy, a founder partner of M/s. Classic Enterprises, filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Confirming Sale of Partnership Assets. Concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and District Judge under Section 34 are not perverse and not liable to be interfered with in appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appellant's Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Confirming Payment of Balance Consideration Under MoU. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Execution of MoU and Payment of Consideration Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34.

20 Jul 2026

The Appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Dismissing Section 34 Application. The court held that the challenge to the arbitral award on merits is not permissible under Section 34 as the award is not patently illegal or against public policy.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Lease Dispute — Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Arbitration Clause. Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator, the court may appoint one.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Satyam Cineplexes Limited, a company engaged in managing multiplex cinema halls, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Complainant Company's Authorised Representative Held Competent to File Complaint. The court set aside acquittal and remanded the case for fresh consideration on merits, finding that the trial court erred in holding that the complaint was not filed by an authorised person.

27 Sep 2013

The appellant, M/s Canara Workshops Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiab...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Cotton Contracts Despite Minor Omissions in Contract Notes; Substantial Compliance with By-laws Sufficient under Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932. Omission to fill blanks relating to measurements and settlement rate difference does not render contracts void if trade practice supports substantial compliance.

31 Mar 1958

The dispute arose from cotton transactions between the appellants and the respondent, both members of the East India Cotton Association Ltd. The appel...

70 71 72 73 74

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)