High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contained an arbitration clause, and thus appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the partners.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Prabhakar Reddy, a founder partner of M/s. Classic Enterprises, filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008. The respondents, including other partners and the firm, opposed the petitions, arguing that the reconstitution deed was never acted upon and that the original partnership deed did not contain an arbitration clause. The court examined the reconstitution deed and found that it contained a clear arbitration clause. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is established and that the petitioner is entitled to appointment of an arbitrator. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes between the parties as per the reconstitution deed. The petitions were allowed.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Clause - The petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008. The respondents opposed, contending that the reconstitution deed was not acted upon and that the original partnership deed did not contain an arbitration clause. The court examined the reconstitution deed and found that it contained an arbitration clause. Held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is established, and the court appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there exists a valid arbitration agreement between the parties and whether the petitioner is entitled to appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes between the parties as per the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • existence of arbitration clause
  • appointment of arbitrator
  • Section 11(5)(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • partnership dispute
  • reconstitution deed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (07) 25

C.M.P. No. 152 of 2014 and C.M.P. No. 151 of 2014

2015-07-20

Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri

Sri Vishnu Hegde for petitioner, Sri H.S. Dwarakanath for respondent 1

Shri Prabhakar Reddy

Mr. H.R. Ravichandra, Shri D.M. Poornesh, Smt. Saraswathamma, Shri P.V. Naveen, Smt. Manjula Reddy, M/s. Classic Enterprises

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a competent person as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents as per reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between partners of M/s. Classic Enterprises; the petitioner sought arbitration as per the reconstitution deed.

Issues

Whether there exists a valid arbitration agreement between the parties. Whether the petitioner is entitled to appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contains an arbitration clause and that disputes have arisen. Respondents contended that the reconstitution deed was never acted upon and that the original partnership deed does not contain an arbitration clause.

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of an arbitration clause in the reconstitution deed establishes a valid arbitration agreement, and the court has the power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Judgment Excerpts

The reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contains an arbitration clause. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes between the parties.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondents opposed. The court heard the matter and allowed the petitions on 20.7.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(5), Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal on Limitation Issue — Show Cause Notice Held Time-Barred. The relevant date for computing limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 for recovery of duty in case of provisional assessment is the dat...