Search Results for "Security Guidelines"

1019 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1019 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Retirement Benefits Withheld Due to Caste Certificate Dispute — DOPT Circular Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Without Following Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dilip Chintaman Nandankar, was a Development Officer appointed on 20.05.1987 in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in the New India Ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging De-empanelment of Advocate by Bank of Baroda Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Issued with Premeditation Violates Right to Fair Hearing Under Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a registered legal practitioner since 1980 and empanelled with the Bank of Baroda for over 30 years, was de-empanelled by a communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MSRTC's 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' Scheme for Re-appointing Terminated/Suspended Conductors as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Scheme Allowing Re-appointment of Conductors Charged with Misappropriation of Funds Violates Public Interest and Article 14 of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court, in a suo motu public interest litigation, examined the validity of the 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' scheme introduced by the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MPLADS Circular Allowing Funds for Private Hospitals in COVID-19 Relief. Circular dated April 8, 2020, permitting MPLADS funds for private hospitals is intra vires the MPLAD Scheme and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a circular dated April 8, 2020, issued by the Joint Secretary (MP...