Search Results for "possession transfer"

4076 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4076 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Protected Tenant Statutory Ownership Under Section 38E of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. Deemed Purchase Not Defeated by Alleged Refusal of Possession or Compromise by Some Legal Heirs; Compliance with Section 32 Mandatory for Surrender.

The dispute involves a protected tenancy over agricultural land under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The original tenant, Mal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Housing Dispute — Upholds Cooperative Court's Order for Transfer of Flat. Transfer of share and interest in a tenant co-partnership society requires compliance with by-laws and rules; society cannot refuse transfer without valid reason.

The Petitioner, Smt. Geeta Narayan Parvati, was a lecturer and member of Respondent No.2 Society, a tenant co-partnership society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restriction period ends.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had upheld the decre...