Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restriction period ends.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had upheld the decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The suit property was granted to Bale Venkataramanappa under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, with a 15-year non-alienation clause expiring on 13.10.1988. On 15.05.1990, during the non-alienation period, Venkataramanappa executed an agreement to sell the property to the plaintiff Govindappa, receiving full consideration and handing over possession. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance in 1999. The trial court dismissed the suit holding the agreement void due to the statutory bar. The first appellate court reversed, and the High Court upheld the reversal. The Supreme Court examined Section 61 of the Act, which prohibits transfer by sale, gift, exchange, mortgage, lease or assignment within 15 years. The Court held that an agreement to sell is a transfer and falls within the prohibition. The agreement was void ab initio and cannot be enforced even after the restriction period ends. The Court also noted that the plaintiff's suit was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond three years from the date of the agreement. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the judgments of the first appellate court and the High Court, and restoring the trial court's dismissal.

Headnote

A) Land Reforms - Restriction on Transfer - Section 61 Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Agreement to Sell - The court considered whether an agreement to sell executed during the 15-year non-alienation period is enforceable. Held that the agreement to sell is a transfer and void ab initio, not enforceable even after the restriction period ends (Paras 11-16).

B) Specific Performance - Void Agreement - Agreement to Sell - The court held that an agreement to sell which is void under Section 61 cannot be enforced by a suit for specific performance. The plaintiff cannot rely on the agreement after the restriction period as the agreement itself is void from inception (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an agreement to sell executed during the non-alienation period under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 is enforceable in law

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Judgment and order of the High Court and first appellate court set aside. Suit for specific performance dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act
  • 1961 prohibits transfer of granted land within 15 years
  • agreement to sell is a transfer
  • void ab initio
  • not enforceable even after restriction period ends
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (9) 95

Civil Appeal Nos. 7630-7631 of 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 29205-29206 of 2015)

2019-09-26

B.R. Gavai

Smt. Narayanamma & Anr. Etc. Etc.

Sri Govindappa & Ors. Etc. Etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment upholding decree for specific performance of agreement to sell

Remedy Sought

Defendants sought to set aside the decree for specific performance and dismissal of the suit

Filing Reason

Agreement to sell executed during statutory non-alienation period under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed suit; first appellate court decreed suit; High Court dismissed second appeals

Issues

Whether the agreement to sell dated 15.05.1990 is enforceable in law despite being executed during the non-alienation period under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961

Submissions/Arguments

Defendants: Section 61 prohibits transfer; agreement to sell is a transfer and void; trial court correct Plaintiff: Section 61 prohibits only sale, gift, etc., not agreement to sell; agreement becomes enforceable after restriction period; defendants did not contest

Ratio Decidendi

An agreement to sell executed during the non-alienation period under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 is a transfer and void ab initio, and cannot be enforced even after the restriction period ends.

Judgment Excerpts

The agreement to sell is nothing but a transfer and the same is prohibited under Section 61 of the Reforms Act. The agreement to sell dated 15.05.1990 being void ab initio, the same could not have been enforced.

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 93/1999 filed by plaintiff for specific performance; trial court dismissed suit; Regular Appeal No. 86/2004 allowed by first appellate court; Regular Second Appeal Nos. 1925/2008 and 1834/2008 dismissed by High Court; appeals to Supreme Court by defendants.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961: Section 61
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restrictio...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Restoring Trial Court Orders on Complaint Maintainability and Deposition Authority. Complaint Filed Through Authorised Representative Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held ...