Search Results for "open delivery"

1800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Second Appeal in Part, Remands for Demarcation of Encroached Land. Dispute over ownership and encroachment of land survey no. 34/1 at Jaswantpura, Aurangabad, with conflicting claims between plaintiffs and CIDCO.

The case involves two second appeals by the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a common judgment of the appellate court. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Order in Coal Transport Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on committee report and weighment system held to be interim and not subject to writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanwal Coal Carriers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with Western Coalfields Limited (respondents) for driving pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Timber Auction Bid Sheets. Bid Sheet for Purchase of Timber from Forest Department Not a 'Conveyance' Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 as It Does Not Transfer Any Right, Title or Interest in Property.

The Nagpur Timber Merchants Association and another petitioner challenged a Government Resolution dated 27.08.2009 and subsequent directions by which ...