Search Results for "money order refused"

2810 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2810 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Motions in Suit by Foreign Trustees for Recovery of Assets Allegedly Concealed in India. The Court Examines Whether Plaintiffs Have Made Out Prima Facie Case for Disclosure and Deposit Orders Based on US Bankruptcy Court Findings.

The suit was filed by ITC Ltd., acting as trustees in bankruptcy of Suresh Chitalia, Devang Chitalia, EST Fibres Inc., and Lokman Establishment, to re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Accused, a Police Officer, Was Convicted for Demanding and Accepting Rs.400 as Illegal Gratification for Granting Bail.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard Criminal Appeal No. 104 of 1999 challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — No Prejudice to Defendants as Trial Not Commenced. Amendment sought to convert suit from injunction to partition is permissible when no evidence has been led and no vested right is affected.

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.60 of 1988, challenged the order of the Ad-hoc District Judge-8, Pune dated 10/01/2020, ...