Search Results for "incorrect particulars"

1041 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1041 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Contractual Employees Against Municipal Corporation for Regularization and Equal Pay. Court Holds That Long-Term Contractual Workers Are Entitled to Consideration for Regularization Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractual employees of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation seeking regularization of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Suit: High Court Erred in Holding No Mortgage Created Despite Agreement to Deposit Title Deeds. Equitable Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Under Section 58(f) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Established Through Agreement and Evidence.

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between the appellant (plaintiff) and the respondent (defendant) in February 1995, where the appellant advan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.

The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...