Search Results for "promotion orders"

2051 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2051 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits for Broken Period Service in Government Polytechnic College Case. Court directs condonation of break from 13.06.1965 to 29.06.1966 for pensionable service under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Deelip S/o Harishchandra Jadhav, a retired employee of Government Polytechnic College, Dhule, filed two writ petitions seeking pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging CAT Direction for Expert Committee in Promotion Exam Dispute. CAT's Order to Consider Proportionate Marks for Defective Questions Does Not Amount to Revaluation and Is Within Jurisdiction.

The petitioners, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged the judgment and order dated 22 February 2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Correction of Date of Birth in School Records at Fag End of Service — Delay and Lack of Credible Evidence Lead to Dismissal. The appellant failed to prove his date of birth as 29-9-1959 and the suit was barred by limitation under Section 96 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Mahesha, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...