Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Restores Eviction Orders Against Tenants for Subletting Under Section 105-B of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Tenants failed to prove lawful occupation of alleged subtenants, burden of proof not discharged.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging a common judgment and order dated 31st December 2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Criminal Complaint for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Beyond Jurisdiction Requires Inquiry Before Issuance of Process

The petitioner, Motilal Khivraj Banthia, was an accused in RTC No.254 of 2010 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kopargaon, District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Charitable Trust for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Framji Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanatorium, is a public charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging MCOCA Application for Lack of Continuing Unlawful Activity. Court holds that isolated past offences without material showing ongoing criminal activity cannot attract provisions of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999.

The petitioners, Appa @ Prakash Haribhau Londhe and Uttam Ramchandra Hole, filed separate criminal writ petitions challenging the applicability of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Tax Revision Against Tribunal Order Restoring Equal Addition and Penalty Under TNVAT Act, 2006. Taxpayer Argues Stock Variation Computed from Notional Trading Method Without Physical Verification Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 27(3)(c).

The case involved a tax revision petition filed by M/s. Vista Garments, a registered dealer under the CGST Act, 2017, engaged in manufacturing hosiery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...