Search Results for "Export Goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Export Goods"

819 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 819 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

11 Jul 2014

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

2 Jun 2023

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

2 Jun 2020

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment in Insurance Claim Dispute. Full and Final Settlement Discharge Voucher Signed Without Demur Bars Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Delhi High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Customs Drawback with Interest — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- with 6% Interest Under Section 27A of Customs Act, 1962. Drawback Sanctioned but Withheld Due to Investigation; Court Holds Mere Pendency of Investigation Does Not Justify Withholding Payment and Rejects Limitation and Unjust Enrichment Defenses.

22 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Vina Ahuja, sole proprietor of Venus Designs, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking refund of customs drawback am...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in DEPB Licence Deduction Case — ITAT's Recall Order Under Section 254(2) Upheld as Within Jurisdiction. The court held that the ITAT's recall of its earlier order was justified as it had not considered a binding precedent and relevant statutory provisions, constituting a mistake apparent from the record under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

25 Feb 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-9 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 15th January, 2007,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)