Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay Due to Suppression of Material Undertaking. Employee Bound by Written Undertaking to Refund Excess Payments and Failure to Disclose It Violated Principle of Clean Hands in Writ Jurisdiction.

The writ petition arose from orders dated 18.11.2019 and 22.11.2019 issued by the Sub-Divisional Engineer, Civil, Zilla Parishad, Vaijapur, directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Compensation for COVID-19 Death at Jalgaon Civil Hospital, Finds No Negligence. Death due to COVID-19 does not automatically imply medical negligence; hospital followed standard protocols.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Pratibha Shinde, President of Lok Sangharsh Morcha, along with two other petitioners, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Compensation for Custodial Death Due to Negligence in Medical Treatment - Undertrial Prisoner Died from Lack of Timely Medical Care Despite Requests. State Liable for Violation of Article 21 for Failure to Provide Medical Treatment to Prisoner Suffering from Spondylosis.

The petitioners, being the parents, widow, and minor children of the deceased Pratap Kute, an undertrial prisoner who died in custody, filed a writ pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Human Trafficking and Immoral Traffic Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioners, who were customers of a brothel, held not liable under Section 370(a)(2) IPC and Sections 3,4,5,6 of ITP Act as they did not traffic or exploit victims.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad allowed two criminal writ petitions filed by accused Nos.7, 8, and 9 in Sessions Case No.209 of 2020, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Reopening Enquiry. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961 Cannot Be Initiated After 17 Years from Original Order.

The petitioner, Ashok Rangrao Deshmukh, a resident of Parbhani, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against AICTE for Denial of Approval to Technical College Despite Earlier Directions. Court holds that AICTE cannot refuse approval based on deficiencies not communicated in show cause notice and must comply with earlier judicial orders.

The petitioners, Akole Taluka Education Society and its Technical Campus, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the All India Council for T...