Search Results for "sampling requirement"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Food Safety License Suspension Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. License Suspension and Stop Activities Orders Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Under Section 32 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioner, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, doing business under the brand name 'Goras B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal by Pollution Control Board in Water Pollution Case — Sanction for Prosecution Valid Under Section 49 of Water Act. Chairman's Sanction Pursuant to Board Resolution is Sufficient Compliance with Section 49 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

The Gujarat Pollution Control Board (Appellant) filed a criminal complaint against Respondent No. 2 and others for violation of Sections 24 and 25 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Circumstantial Evidence Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Gopinath Tukaram Sable, whose dead body was found near a field with injuries. The appellant, father of the deceased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret information not reduced to writing and sent to superior officer, and accused not informed of right to be searched before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer, leading to acquittal.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Excise Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Rules. Conviction for illegal possession of liquor set aside as prosecution failed to produce sample bottles as required under Rule 21 of Karnataka Excise Rules, 1967.

The petitioner, Shrinivas, was convicted by the Trial Court (JMFC, Gundlupet) under Section 32 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 for being in illegal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case for Non-Compliance of Mandatory Notice Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Failure to Serve Notice to Accused for Right to Get Sample Examined by Central Laboratory Vitiates Prosecution.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Rajaram and Nandlal Kanekar, vendors and proprietor of M/s Kumar Masala Gruha Udyog, against their conv...