Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Food Safety License Suspension Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. License Suspension and Stop Activities Orders Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Under Section 32 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, doing business under the brand name 'Goras Bhandar' for about 80 years, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 31.05.2026 by the Food Safety Officer directing the petitioner to stop all activities and recall all sold food items, and (2) an order dated 01.06.2026 by the Designated Officer suspending the petitioner's license under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The petitioner claimed that in 80 years, no show cause notice or improvement notice under Section 32 of the Act was ever served. On 31.05.2026, the Food Safety Officer visited the premises, prepared a panchanama, inspected, and immediately passed the order to stop activities and recall food items. The inspection report led to the license suspension order. The court noted that the impugned orders were passed without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court held that the orders are unsustainable and set them aside, granting liberty to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law after issuing a show cause notice and giving an opportunity of hearing. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Section 32 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - The court considered whether the suspension of license and direction to stop activities and recall food items without issuing a show cause notice under Section 32 of the Act of 2006 is valid - Held that the impugned orders were passed without giving any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and thus are unsustainable (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suspension of license and direction to stop activities and recall food items without issuing a show cause notice under Section 32 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 31.05.2026 and 01.06.2026 are quashed and set aside. The respondents are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law after issuing a show cause notice and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • License suspension
  • Food safety
  • Alternate remedy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 178

Writ Petition No. 4542 of 2026

2026-07-07

Anil S. Kilor, Raj D. Wakode

2026:BHC-NAG:8746-DB

F. T. Mirza (Senior Advocate) i/b S. K. Bhoyar for petitioner, N. S. Rao (Assistant Government Pleader) for respondents/State

Wardha Tahsil Go-Dugdha Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Wardha

State of Maharashtra through Food and Drug Administration, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging suspension of license and direction to stop activities and recall food items under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders dated 31.05.2026 and 01.06.2026.

Filing Reason

Orders were passed without issuing show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders are sustainable without issuing a show cause notice under Section 32 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability due to alternate remedy. Petitioner argued that no show cause notice or improvement notice under Section 32 was ever served, and orders were passed without opportunity of hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The impugned orders were passed without giving any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and thus are unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned orders are passed without giving any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which is in violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, the impugned orders are unsustainable and are liable to be quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31.05.2026 by the Food Safety Officer directing to stop activities and recall food items, and the order dated 01.06.2026 by the Designated Officer suspending the license. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 07.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: Section 32
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Food Safety License Suspension Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. License Suspension and Stop Activities Orders Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Under Section 32 of Food Safety and Standards Act...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Headmistress for Lack of Prior Approval Under Rule 35(2) of MEPS Rules, 1981. Management's failure to obtain prior approval from Education Officer renders suspension order invalid from inception.