Search Results for "material representation"

3859 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3859 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection in Election Petition No. 11 of 2009 Alleging EVM Tampering and Excess Expenditure. The Court Hears Arguments on Maintainability Under Sections 81(3) and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment pertains to an election petition filed by Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar, an independent candidate, challenging the election of Ashok Shankarrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Inclusion of Property in Town Planning Scheme Due to Admitted Mistake. Court directs rectification of error and consideration of variation under Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, owners of Survey No.4229 admeasuring 41.99 sq.mtrs with a residential building opposite Municipality Office, Anjar-Kachchh, filed a p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by Advisory Board. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Shrinivas Kishor Sanga, challenged his detention order dated 30/10/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu. Failure to Serve Grounds in English to South African National Who Does Not Know English Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of PITNDPS Act.

The petitioner, Agisilaos Demetriades, a South African national, challenged an order of detention dated 21.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.2, the Join...