Search Results for "intentional suppression"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates in Thakur Community Case — Fraud Allegation Not Proved. Committee Failed to Demonstrate Intentional Suppression of Contrary Entries by Validity Holders Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The Bombay High Court dealt with six writ petitions filed by blood relatives of the Wagh family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Earnest Money by KSFC in E-Auction Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner Claims Suppression of Pending Suit and Interim Order Affected Marketable Title, Rendering Auction Notification Fraudulent.

The petitioner, N. Lakshmana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Police Head Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Ramesh Tukaram Wagh, a Police Head Constable, in Special Case (PCA) No.4/2012 by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...