Search Results for "developer capacity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "developer capacity"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Flat Purchasers' Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Developer for Delayed Possession — Interest Extended Until Actual Possession. The Court held that the developer cannot avoid liability for interest by denying possession due to the filing of a consumer complaint, and the contractual compensation rate was inadequate under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves a consumer dispute between flat purchasers and a developer, Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., regarding delayed possession of flats in Banga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.

12 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

24 Sep 2013

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Against Ombudsman Orders for New Electricity Connections. Court holds that refusal to provide new connections based on previous dues of a different entity is arbitrary and violative of Section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Jan 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders of the Ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance and Cooperative Society Registration. Registration of Tenants Coownership Cooperative Housing Society under Section 12(1) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is valid despite prior declaration under Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.

19 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Rahul Enterprises, a proprietary concern engaged in development and construction, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Amey Cooperative Housing Society in Navi Mumbai — No Violation of FSI or Development Control Regulations Found. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or violation of law, and the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans.

18 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sandeep Thakur challenging the construction of the Amey Cooperative Housin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

27 Sep 2019

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

26 Aug 2024

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Receiver Appointment Plea in Redevelopment Dispute — Oral Contract Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act. Court holds that an oral agreement for redevelopment of a co-operative housing society, even if evidenced by resolutions, is not specifically enforceable under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and that appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not warranted when the plaintiff has no legal right to possession.

12 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Mangal Milan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking specific performance of an oral contract for redevelopment of the ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)