Search Results for "deprivation test"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition of Defence Personnel's Child Seeking MBBS Admission After Online Preference Error. CET Cell Asserts No Technical Glitch and No Provision for Correction.

The petitioner, Shashi Saraswat, appeared for NEET-UG 2018 and secured All India Rank 31718. She was eligible for admission under the Defence3 quota, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Respondent's Claim of Reduction in Rank, Holds Mere Reversion from Officiating Post Not Violative of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India. The Court distinguished Vaikunthe's case, finding that reversion without permanent bar to promotion does not attract Article 311(2).

The case arose from the Southern Railway where the respondent, S. Raghavendrachar, was originally employed as a Train Examiner in the pay scale of Rs....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...