Search Results for "arbitrator bias"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Ineligibility of Retired CPWD Officers as Arbitrators under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. Appointment of Retired Additional Director General of CPWD as Arbitrator Without Contractor's Consent Violates Seventh Schedule and Mandates Express Agreement Post-Dispute.

The petitioner, a construction company, entered into six separate agreements with the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for various construction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in CPWD Contract Dispute, Holding Retired Departmental Officers Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Former Judge as Sole Arbitrator to Resolve Multiple Contractual Disputes Arising from Six Construction Agreements.

The dispute arose from six separate construction contracts awarded by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) to M/s Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Refuses to Substitute Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Mandate Extension Petitions Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Allegations of Bias and Delay Based on Adverse Rulings in Related IHFL Arbitration Found Insufficient to Justify Drastic Substitution.

The judgment concerned two arbitration petitions filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Contractors and service providers seek independent arbitrator for claims against Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike under Clause 10 of Agreement dated 15-03-2007.

Multiple civil miscellaneous petitions were filed by contractors and service providers before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru under Section 1...