KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "aggregate court fee"
247 result(s) found
Found 247 result(s)
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Challenging Admission of Section 7 Application by Allottees Against Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT order allowing impleadment of allottees and admitting the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as default was established.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two appeals filed against an order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Principal B...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Assessment on Demerger Scheme Under Article 25(da) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Key Issue Pertains to Deduction of Debts from Enterprise Value in Calculating Market Value of Shares and Jurisdiction of Revenue Authority over NCLT-Sanctioned Scheme.
9 May 2025The writ petition arose from a dispute over stamp duty payable on a Scheme of Arrangement for demerger of the consumer mobile business of Tata Teleser...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition and First Appeal Challenging Stop Work Notice and Revocation of Commencement Certificate for Public Parking Lot Construction; Considers Whether Deemed Permission Under Regulation 6(4) of DCR 1991 Was Obtained and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated. The Court Examines Legal Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 51 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, in Context of Completed Construction of 15 Upper Floors of PPL Based on Incentive FSI Under Clause 24 of Regulation 33.
27 Jan 2016The matter arose from construction activities undertaken by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited on Plot No.5B+6 at Worli, Mumbai, involving a high-...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.
16 Apr 2015The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...
- 141
High Court
KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.
23 Jan 2024The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...
- 72
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Registration Case — Assessee Not Entitled to Section 12AA Registration. Activities of Setting Up Effluent Treatment Plants for Leather Industry Constitute General Public Utility, Not Preservation of Environment, and Receipts Exceed Threshold Under Second Proviso to Section 2(15) of Income-Tax Act, 1961.
21 Jan 2026The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 28.03.2012, which had allowed registration under Section 12AA...
- 83
