KAHC010023912010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 16(1)"
2264 result(s) found
Found 2264 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeals on Duty Liability for Confiscated Medical Equipment Cleared Under Conditional Exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus. Court Examines Whether Redemption of Goods is a Pre-Condition for Customs Duty Demand Under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.
28 Apr 2006Background: The case involves two customs appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, filed by the Commissioner of Customs against separate...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.
12 Aug 2024The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...
- 418
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Application for Dismissal of Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 83 of Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court examines whether the failure to file an affidavit in Form 25 along with the petition alleging corrupt practices within the 45-day limitation period mandates dismissal under Section 86 or Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
8 Nov 2006The dispute arose from an election petition filed under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of responde...
- 113
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Vesting of Land in State for Violation of Scheduled Tribe Land Transfer Restrictions. Exchange of Land by Scheduled Tribe Member Without Prior Permission and in Disproportionate Value is Void Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
3 Mar 2020The case involves an appeal by the Additional Commissioner, Revenue and others against the judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court which set aside orde...
- 453
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case — Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC Permitted Despite Earlier Closure Report. The Court held that the Special Court could take cognizance on a charge sheet filed after further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC even if a closure report under Section 173(2) CrPC had been previously accepted.
28 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a High Court order quashing the prosecution of D. Dwarakanadha Reddy (A...
- 243
High Court
- 23
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Exchange Dispute Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — Exchange Deed Without Permission Held Voidable, Not Void, and Not Challengeable by Original Sellers. Original tenure holders who sold land cannot challenge subsequent exchange; limitation period for ejectment under Section 167 is six years.
17 Sep 2019The case involves a dispute over plot no. 2902 in Village Mathura Bangar, District Mathura, U.P. Smt. Chando and Sita Ram (original tenure holders) so...
- 281
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.
15 Jun 2026The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...
- 87
