Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Arbitration Appeals Under National Highways Act, 1956. The appeals challenged arbitration awards fixing compensation for land acquisition; the Court examined the scope of arbitration under the National Highways Act, 1956.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
Admin
2026-11-09 14:07:09
  • 98
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 06 OF 2015

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (11) 81

Arbitration Appeal No. 06 of 2015 along with connected appeals (AA Nos. 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 of 2015, 05 of 2016, 04 of 2016, 06 of 2016)

2021-11-26

Rishabhkumar s/o Babulal Jejani (in AA 06/2015)

Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, National Highways Authority of India, The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur and Arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956, The Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration appeals against awards determining compensation for land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought enhancement of compensation or setting aside of arbitrator's awards.

Filing Reason

Dispute over compensation determined by the Arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956.

Previous Decisions

The Arbitrator passed awards determining compensation; the present appeals challenge those awards.

Procedural History

The Arbitrator passed awards under the National Highways Act, 1956; the appellants filed these arbitration appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • National Highways Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Arbitration Appeal National Highways Act, 1956 Land Acquisition Compensation Arbitrator

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Lacks Conclusive Proof. The court found that the plaintiffs did not establish a concluded contract necessary for specific performance under the Code of Civil Procedure, 19... 2026-11-10 07:35:38
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Bangalore Development Authority's Authority to Levy Charges for Development. The court found Section 32(5A) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 unconstitutional for granting unbridled power to levy charges without c... 2026-11-10 07:35:37
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation Land Acquisition burden of proof jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Order for Appointment of Exc...

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enforcement Directorate Actions in Multiple Writ Petitions...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?