Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

186 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Power Grid Corporation's Appeal Against Writ Order Directing Re-determination of Compensation Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Court Holds That Once Award Is Passed and Compensation Received Under 1894 Act, Proceedings Are Not Deemed to Have Lapsed Under Section 24(1)(a).

17 Apr 2026

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Power Grid Corporation of India Limited against an order dated 25.07.2022 in W.P.No.15495 of 2015. The acquis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

High Court Directs Recalculation of Land Compensation under New Acquisition Law. Court Orders Fresh Award, Ensuring Enhanced Compensation Based on 2013 Act.

26 Jul 2024

The High Court addressed the issue of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court observed that the Special Land Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse and Subsequent Possession Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Held that Once Acquisition Lapses, Possession Cannot Be Retained Without Fresh Proceedings.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Golatgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.

20 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Agricultural University Due to Inordinate Delay. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 9, 11 — Petitioners challenged acquisition after 20 years of award; court held delay and laches bar the writ petitions.

10 May 2012

The judgment concerns five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the benefit of Panjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for High School and Playground in Development Plan. Petitioners failed to show that reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 as no notice under Section 127 was issued.

21 Sep 2005

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.99 (now 99-A) and site Nos.142 and 145 at Malegaon, District Nasik, filed a writ petition seeking de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Petitioners Failed to Show Prejudice from Entry Made During Consolidation Proceedings. Mutation entries do not confer title; proper remedy is civil suit under Article 226 of Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) c...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)