Search Results for "Name Discrepancy"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Confiscation of Forest Produce and Vehicle Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Order sustained.

The dispute originated from the confiscation of red sanders logs and a transport vehicle by forest authorities in Maharashtra. The petitioners, transp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Caste-Based Murder Case — Evidence of Eyewitnesses Found Credible Despite Minor Contradictions. The Court held that the testimony of a single reliable witness is sufficient for conviction, and delay in FIR receipt does not vitiate the case if explained.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the conviction of seven accused for the murder of Murugaiyan, a Scheduled Caste man, and for setting his h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Letters of Administration — Will Proved by Attesting Witness Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court Held That the Propounder Removed All Suspicious Circumstances and the Will Was Genuine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a single judge granting Letters of Administration to the respondent, Rakesh Phoolchand Jain, in respect of the las...